3 seats free. No card. Upgrade per seat as you grow.
Free forever for teams up to 3 seats.
Your newest hires learned from YouTube, not textbooks. Here's why your training is failing them.
Free download. No credit card required.
Start free, forever. 3 seats, no credit card. Bring your own docs.
The forgetting curve: without deliberate recall, most of what we learn is gone within days. A repository keeps the document safe. It does nothing to keep the skill in the person.
If you are looking for knowledge retention software because your team keeps being trained and still cannot do the thing when it counts, this page is about your problem. There is a second product that also answers to “knowledge retention software,” and it is worth ruling out fast so you are not shopping for the wrong one.
The kind most people actually need retains knowledge by keeping it in people. The information was never lost; it is sitting right in the document. What is gone is the skill: your team learned it, and the forgetting curve took it back. A file you can search does nothing about that. It is technically findable and practically gone, which is exactly the gap that drives the cost of skill decay .
The other kind retains knowledge by storing it: wikis, documentation platforms, searchable repositories whose job is to keep what a departing employee knew from leaving with them. That is a real category, and if institutional memory walking out the door is your only worry, that is the one to buy. For everyone whose trained skills keep fading on the floor, it is the wrong shelf.
| What you are comparing | A knowledge repository (wiki, KM tool) | HeyLoopy |
|---|---|---|
| What it retains | The document, the institutional record | The skill, in your team’s heads |
| Where the knowledge lives | In a system you search | In the person, ready to use |
| How it is reinforced | It is not; it waits to be looked up | Active recall, spaced over time |
| The failure mode | Knowledge nobody remembers to use | Solved: the skill resurfaces on schedule |
| What you measure | Pages, searches, what is stored | Mastery per person, slipping skills flagged |
| Best when | Turnover threatens institutional memory | Trained skills keep fading on the floor |
The forgetting curve, described by Hermann Ebbinghaus more than a century ago, is blunt: without deliberate reinforcement, most of what we learn decays within days. A repository is built to defeat loss of the record. It was never built to defeat decay in the person, and the two are not the same gap. The research on closing the second one is settled. You retain what you are made to recall, not what you filed away to read again. (The science, in plain terms. )
That is the line HeyLoopy is built on, and it is the whole idea behind training that sticks . It takes the documents and procedures you already have, the same ones that would otherwise sit in the repository, and turns them into spaced retrieval practice, so the knowledge ends up where it is useful: in the person, under pressure, when the document is the last thing they have time to open. (How the practice loop works. )
If your team was trained and still cannot do it when it counts, a better filing system will not touch that. (A strong repository is the right buy only if your single worry is knowledge walking out the door with the people who hold it.) That is the gap HeyLoopy is built to close. Start free on a procedure your team keeps having to look up, and watch it become something they actually retain.
HeyLoopy reports mastery over time, so retention stops being a hope about whether anyone read the doc and becomes a number you can act on.
It depends which of the two it is. Knowledge management style tools capture and store information so it does not walk out the door when an employee leaves: wikis, documentation, searchable repositories. Retention in the learning sense, which is what HeyLoopy does, works on the other half: making sure the people still have the skill, by turning the material into spaced retrieval practice rather than a document to find later.
That is storage plus delivery. The wiki keeps the knowledge findable and the LMS delivers it once. Neither does the part that decides whether your team can perform the skill cold next month, which is reinforcement. A document your team has to look up every time is a sign the skill never actually stuck.
Good documentation is worth having, and it is passive. It sits there until someone needs it and remembers it exists. Retention is active: the skill is practiced and resurfaced on a schedule so it is in the person’s head when the moment comes, not only in a folder they could search.
You measure mastery, percent correct per person and per skill over time, not page views on a document or a completion checkbox. A skill that is starting to slip shows up as a downward trend you can act on before it costs you on the floor.
Minutes. Start free, drop in a document or procedure you already rely on, and HeyLoopy builds the drills that move it from the repository into your team’s actual recall.
Start free on a procedure your team keeps having to look up, or get a walkthrough. Watch it move from a document nobody remembers into a skill they retain.